Even When Sober and Drug-Free, Hunter Biden Is a Raging Narcissist
It is clear after over three years of Joe placing himself Forrest Gump-like in every major historical event since 1960 that narcissism is a Biden family genetic malady.
The Oxford Dictionary defines “narcissist” as "a person who has an excessive interest in or admiration of themselves.”
With the start of Hunter Biden’s gun trial this week, it is clear Hunter fits this definition whether strung out on crack or stone-cold sober. Why do I make this claim? Simply because if Hunter cared about himself less than he cared about his dad, President Joe Biden, he would have copped a plea bargain with federal prosecutors with or without jail time knowing a pardon would come after the November election. After all, the charges against Biden are unequivocally true and everyone except a potentially biased jury knows that the charges are true. Hunter bought a gun when on drugs and swore on a federal form to the contrary.
Regardless of the outcome, Joe comes out a big loser. If Hunter is found guilty, whatever upside Joe gets from being able to use Hunter’s conviction to refute Donald Trump’s claim of a biased judicial system is swamped by the official findings that (1) Hunter’s laptop is authentic; (2) everyone knew in October 2020 that it was authentic; (3) high-level members of Joe’s administration (i.e., Anthony Blinken) purposefully lied and interfered with a federal election by getting 51 intelligence members to claim the laptop was “Russian disinformation;” (4) it reminds Americans of all the gross, deranged, and foreign government corruption content on the laptop involving Hunter, Joe, and other Biden Family members; and, (5) most damning, Joe himself knowingly lied through his teeth in the debate with Trump about the authenticity of the laptop (and his role in Hunter’s business and Hunter’s profiteering in China and…), thereby undermining any claim Joe has at being a straight-shooting truth-teller unlike the “convicted felon” Trump.
Even worse, if a Delaware jury comprised of people long familiar with the Biden Family acquit Hunter or hang the jury (subtle touch there, Jill Biden, making eye contact with every juror), Trump’s claim of a biased judicial system will gain powerful legs to use to persuade voters to ignore his conviction. It is a simple statement: complex case with unknown predicate crime garners a conviction against Trump in New York City before a biased judge, prosecutor, and jury, as simple case where guilt is clearly known snags an acquittal for Hunter in Delaware.
Trump also will use Hunter’s non-conviction like a two-by-four to whack Joe in his already-addled head at their debate later this month. Trump’s claim will resonate with Americans who have long believed the judicial system is biased against them, with special force in the black community whose claims of bias have long been ignored. This issue, along with Trump’s economic record, is why his appeal among black men is growing.
Hunter’s narcissism shouldn’t be surprising. After all, it is clear after over three years of Joe placing himself Forrest Gump-like in every major historical event since 1960 that narcissism is a Biden family genetic malady. As I’ve noted previously, you can deride Trump for some of his personality traits, but, unlike Joe, you have to give him credit for raising five fairly successful kids who didn’t end up smoking crack with Russian hookers or bedding a dead sibling’s widow.
The worst part of Hunter’s laptop isn’t its content related to drugs, prostitution, porn, or incest; rather, it is that a meaningful number of voters in the six battleground states would have voted differently in 2020 had the Biden Family, its intel allies, and the biased media not colluded to lie that the laptop was Russian disinformation. Had the intel officials Blinken recruited to sign the infamous letter declined his invitation in order to preserve a semblance that the “deep state” stays out of domestic politics and had the media done the job is is entrusted to do by reporting that Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe and the FBI unequivocally stated the laptop was authentic, Trump would have won the election and saved America from the disaster of the last three years.
Will anyone be held accountable for the laptop lies? Will any prosecutor on the Right indict these people for election interference? Will 60 Minutes’ Lesley Stahl apologize to Trump for erroneously refuting his claim that the laptop was authentic? Will JINOs (journalists in name only) who won awards for their false reporting on the laptop give back those awards? Conversely, will Miranda Devine and Emma Jo Morris rightfully be awarded Pulitzer Prizes for their intrepid and correct reporting about the laptop? Unfortunately, we all know the answer to every one of those questions is a “Hell no!!!”
As someone on Twitter noted, I hope to God during the upcoming debate after Biden refers to him as a "convicted felon," Trump responds, “At least I was found competent enough to stand trial unlike you Joe.” Such a retort would go down as the greatest in history — even greater than Ronald Reagan’s response to the moderator about his old age that he wouldn’t use Walter Mondale’s youth and inexperience against him. Hopefully, when it comes time to choose, voters pick the narcissist who got poorer after getting elected to office making America stronger over the narcissist who got fabulously wealthier making America weaker. We’ve all had enough of the Bidens and their unique brand of dysfunction.