Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matt Urbas's avatar

Interesting - I wasn't "offended" by either of Vivek's foot-in-mouth moments, but his "culture of mediocrity" comment was actually more accurate than "the idea of a heritage American is as loony as anything the woke left has actually out up". Both were obviously moronic things for someone with aspirations to holding elected office. You don't insult your electorate in the first place and then you don't wade hip deep into a controversial issue that is fracturing both your party and persuadable independents and weigh in 100% on one side of the controversy. But "American-ness" is obviously beyond a simple binary, and that's okay, as long as it does we recognize that the binary that DOES exist - that of of legal citizenship or not - is inviolate. But of course there are "heritage Americans", but that's simply a descriptive term, but necessarily one that imputes a higher value to a person.

Neural Foundry's avatar

Solid critique of the strategy here. The point about Ramaswamy spending more energy on symbolic culture debates than state-specific policy is the real issue. I remember seeing similar dynamics in local campaigns where candidates get pulled into national-scale ideological battles and completely lose the thread on what voters actually need. The polling gap you mentioned with Acton is pretty revealing, it suggests voters are looking for someone who understands Ohio's slow job growth and popultaion stagnation, not someone who can win Twitter arguments. Getting Trump's endorsement early might've insulated him from primary chalengers, but it also lets him drift.

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?